Perspectives on greener product development and manufacturing from Sustainable Minds, our partners, customers and contributors.

A bold new standard in eco-design for electronic products

By Richard Kubin on August 1, 2008

One of the general criticisms about standards is that they are almost always out  of date - those leading technical innovation are usually guessing where things are going and hoping they make the right bet. 

Given the increasing awareness and focus on sustainability and on minimizing the overall environmental impact of products across their entire life cycle, is there a useful role for standards?

The folks involved with the creation of the International Electrotechnical Commission's draft standard for Environmentally Conscious Design (ECD) for
Electrical and Electronic Products and Systems (IEC 62430) would answer, "absolutely!"

The new standard, which was released in draft form for final review March 21st (the review period ends September 5th) was initiated by the delegation from Japan, but developed with the participation of technical experts from 26 additional  countries.

In a nutshell, the standard promotes "life cycle thinking" (LCT), which is defined as the "consideration of all relevant environmental aspects during the entire life cycle of products and systems." The key elements of LCT are:

  • Determining to minimize the overall adverse environmental impact of the product
  • Identifying and quantifying the significant environmental aspects of the
    product
  • Considering the trade-offs between environmental aspects and life cycle stages

The standard also goes on to define how an "Environmentally Conscious Design Process (ECD Process)" can be implemented, including processes, supporting data requirements, and the role of systems for analysis/evaluation and control, across all life cycle phases. Figure A.1 from the draft standard provides a great graphical overview of the elements and inter-relations that make up the ECD process.

Fundamental to the approach is that it is considered an iterative process, providing the information and historical record to understand and track
environmental performance over subsequent product generations, and potentially to provide comparison to competitive products.

I believe that this draft standard has real value and is definitely worth evaluating. Unlike some technical standards that are always behind (e.g. IEEE 802.11- how many of you have bought a "draft n" device?), IEC 62430 defines a very useful framework for sustainable product development. In my judgment, it has the potential to foster standard practices for life cycle assessments that will allow end users to make informed purchase decisions. Ultimately, that rewards the producers who are working to make a real difference in sustainability. Further, I believe that the methodology and framework are applicable and of value to other industry verticals beyond the electronics industry.

The IEC 62430 is still in review, so you will have to wait a few more months to read it (unless you are part of the review process!). I'll keep you informed via this blog -- stay tuned to see how it plays out...


Image: © IEC, Geneva, Switzerland, 2008

Reference links:
IEC: Environmentally conscious design for electrical and electronic products and systems

IEC: Project: IEC 62430 Ed. 1.0

Comments

Posted by Mario Vellandi on Aug 10, 2008

I'm happy to hear about this. Any product certification that covers its unique industry is especially beneficial. Ultimately, it comes down to a scorecard of various criteria for which different certifications and activities will add points.
This is the essence of multi-attribute LCAs and scoring. SMaRT and C2C are the best models currently available.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options